by Muleflock » Sat Apr 03, 2010 9:34 am
Hi Becky
I'm going to presume your vet ran an Idexx 3Dx or 4Dx snap heartworm test. The A. phagocytophilum part of the test detects the presence of antibodies to the bacteria, not the organism itself. So the dog may have been infected in the past and cleared the organism or is an asymptomatic carrier. Most dogs I see that are positive for antibodies are either currently ill and are co-infected with another Rickettsial organism or Lymes disease or are positive for Anamplsma alone and have no symptoms. The vast majority of dogs that come up positive for just A.phagocytophilum never show clinical symptoms nor did their owner recognize disease symptoms in the past. Having said that, what this does tell you is that you have ticks that carry the organism, (that can infect you by the way), and if the dog gets co-infected with one of the other Rickettsial organisms or Lymes, he stands a much better chance of becoming clinically ill.
Below is an excerpt from a document I keep handy when I need a quick review. Good luck with him.
........Animals from endemic areas are often exposed to A. phagocytophilum, and 40% or more of dogs in these areas may be seropositive.9 However, since the morbidity is low, it appears that many animals may have antibodies to A. phagocytophilum without having any concurrent evidence of clinical disease. Since persistent infection in clinically healthy dogs has been demonstrated,6,7,15 it is likely that a portion of the seropositive animals are chronically infected carriers of the organism. Experimentally, chronically infected carriers did not have any hematologic abnormalities,7 and, thus far, it appears that seropositive animals with no clinical evidence of disease are hematologically normal. Incidents of chronically infected carriers later developing clinical disease have not been clearly documented.
The cyclic appearance of clinical cases that coincide with tick season indicates that canine anaplasmosis is an acute disease that occurs in dogs a week or two after organism inoculation by ticks.5,12 Because chronic infection has not been directly related to clinical disease and because a therapeutic regimen effective in clearing the organism from an infected animal has not been established, treating clinically healthy, seropositive animals is of questionable benefit. However, a seropositive reaction to A. phagocytophilum in a clinically healthy dog should not be disregarded. At a minimum, implement an aggressive tick-control program designed to minimize exposure to ticks, and, hence, to other tick-borne diseases. It is clear that coinfection with two or more tick-borne agents is common and that dogs coinfected with B. burgdorferi and A. phagocytophilum are nearly two times more likely to develop clinical disease than are dogs infected with either agent alone.9 There is also some concern that chronically infected carriers could be adversely affected by therapeutic agents that compromise the immune system or by a concurrent illness that might alter an animal's immune status. The administration of immunosuppressive doses of corticosteroids to infected, asymptomatic dogs resulted in the reappearance of bacteremia, although the animals remained clinically normal.............